Skip to main content

What’s next after the loss of Prop A?

What’s next after the loss of Prop A?
By Andrea Buffa

School Crossing Guard James Moore at Sherman Elementary School on Franklin Street. May 2022

On Tuesday, June 17, the San Francisco Department of Election posted the final results of the June 7 election. Proposition A, the Muni Reliability and Street Safety Bond, received 65.11%, well over 50%, but short of the 66.67% share of the vote that’s required for passage. 

If passed, the bond measure would have provided $400 million for transportation infrastructure projects, including:

  • $250 million on the repair and renovation of SFMTA bus yards, facilities, and equipment
  • $26 million on traffic improvements, such as new traffic signals, wider sidewalks at bus stops and dedicated traffic lanes
  • $10 million on improvements to the Muni train system, including the train communication and control systems
  • $42 million on traffic signal and street crossing improvements, such as more visible traffic and pedestrian signals, curb ramps and signs
  • $42 million on street redesigns that include wider sidewalks, raised crosswalks, protected bike lanes, bus lanes, boarding islands and better lighting
  • $30 million on projects to manage traffic speeds, including lowered speed limits and speed radar signs

Although an overwhelming majority of voters supported investing in our transportation system, getting to the two-thirds threshold for a bond measure is never easy—more so when San Francisco is still recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic and people are struggling with the impacts of inflation.

The loss of Proposition A will have a cascading impact on San Francisco’s transportation projects. In the coming weeks, we’ll be evaluating the impacts of this result to transit and safety projects across the city. We don’t yet know which specific projects will be impacted, but we do know that every step toward getting the city’s transportation capital projects done is going to be harder than it would have been if the bond measure had passed.

The SFMTA is going to do everything possible to find alternative sources for these funds. We know that improving Muni and making streets safer remain priorities for our community—and we’re committed to working to make that a reality. 

The loss of Proposition A is going to make our path to transitioning to a 100% zero emission fleet more difficult, because a large amount of funding was going to go toward upgrading Muni facilities so we can charge battery-electric buses in them. It’s also going to make it harder to fund the street improvements on San Francisco’s high-injury network that are crucial to preventing traffic deaths and serious injuries.

These challenges don’t just impact people who ride Muni, walk or bike to get around. They impact drivers. When more people take transit, bike and walk, it reduces congestion for people who need to travel by car.

As we plan our next steps, we’ll be looking at what we can learn from the election results and how we can apply those lessons moving forward. We need to have more conversations and engagement with community members and community-based organizations—especially those on the west side of the city, where support for the bond measure was lowest—to ensure that we fully understand their transportation needs. We also need to continue building trust with San Franciscans so we can work together to create a robust transportation network that equitably connects everyone to where they need to go, regardless of their income or neighborhood.



Published June 22, 2022 at 01:43AM
https://ift.tt/h2zLHbq

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

News from the WHO: The ceasefire in Gaza brings hope, but immense challenges lie ahead to restore the health system

Published on January 19, 2025 View on website

Slow Streets are Full Steam Ahead

Slow Streets are Full Steam Ahead By Last week, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors ruled against four California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) appeals that have been delaying Slow Streets, temporary emergency transit-only lanes, bike lanes and emergency street closures. Within 12 hours of the Board’s decision, SFMTA crews were back out in full force to implement these critical initiatives that help keep San Francisco moving during the pandemic.  The Board of Supervisors ruled unanimously that these temporary projects are deemed critical to the city’s emergency response efforts, preventing a further delay.  Implementation of new Slow Streets was put on hold while we waited for the appeals hearings, giving crews the opportunity to focus on filling in the signage gaps and repairing existing ...

Scooter Permittees Receive Feedback from Students with Disabilities

Scooter Permittees Receive Feedback from Students with Disabilities By Maddy Ruvolo On a recent Monday in Golden Gate Park, 28 students and staff from AccessSFUSD gathered on JFK Drive to test-ride adaptive scooters. The group took turns riding adaptive devices from two scooter companies permitted to operate in the city, Lime and Spin . Adaptive devices are designed to meet the needs of riders with a variety of disabilities and provide additional stability features, such as a seat, a wider base, and an additional wheel. After trying the scooters, the students shared their feedback about a variety of design elements, including the wheels, seat, throttle, basket location, foot plate width, and the ease of getting started.  Adaptive scooter demo in Golden Gate Park Students embraced the opportunity to ride scooters and provide feedback. AccessSFUSD is a community-based program for students 18-22 with disabilities. Located across 11 sites in San Francisco, the program focuses o...